LGN News Headlines - -
Sun, Jun 29th - 5:46PM
The Lilith eZine Sunday Edition
The Lilith eZine Sunday Edition
Letter from the Editor
Abortion is my topic of discussion today and I am going to start off with some statistics:
73% of American women who have abortions are living below the poverty level (earning $9,570 or less per year).
60% of American women who have abortions already have 1 or more children.
66% of American women who have abortions are not married.
33% of all American women who have abortions are between the age of 20 and 24 and are the largest percentage by age bracket.
52% of American women will have an abortion during their lifetime.
More Abortion Statistics.
From these statistics it appears that there is a very sizable
percentage of young American women who already have kids, are single
mothers, are not married and aren't making very much money. Its really
not surprising that they choose to have an abortion. If I was working
two jobs, making very little money and already had one child to worry
about the last thing I would want is to double the problem.
When you're in that situation it doesn't really feel like you have
much of a choice. Abortion suddenly became more like a need rather than
For years the anti-abortionists have been pushing this
idea that the stereotypical women who have abortions are "corporate
risers" who have sex with the boss to get a promotion, backstab their
co-workers, get pregnant and dump the fetus in the nearest available
abortion clinic all for the sake of capitalist greed.
And while I admit the United States is very capitalistic, the
statistics show that this is simply not true. Instead the women who
have abortions are much more likely to be making minimum wage, is
already a single mother, may be trying to work their way through
university or college, and simply doesn't have the finances to raise 2
or 3 kids by themselves when they have enough trouble with the 1 or 2
they already have.
Why is suddenly a topic for discussion?
John McCain, the Republican Candidate for the 2008 Presidential Election wants to overturn Roe v. Wade, but keep abortion legal for incest & rape exceptions and when the mother's life is in danger.
He also wants to prosecute abortion doctors and says he would nominate
supreme court justices based on their experience and shared values with
respect to abortion.
Could you imagine if abortion suddenly became illegal and the only
way you could get an abortion is if you went across the border to
Canada or Mexico or pretended that someone had raped you? False rape
allegations would skyrocket and cross border shopping and sneaky
terrorists would be the least of the border guards' worries. Young
pregnant women would be lined up at the border needing abortions.
That or we'd go back to the old fashioned way... illegal abortions in secretive clinics.
lest we forget the protests. If 52% of American women will have
abortions during their lifetime, what about the % who still believes in
the right to have an abortion even if they don't need one themselves?
I've been ignoring the male equation in this issue, but think about
all the problems that would cause as well. Extra children being born to
unwed mothers... shotgun weddings, family strife, homelessness, paying
child/spousal support, broken families. Men won't be liking this change
much either (despite the fact that 77% of all anti-abortionist leaders
Politicians generally like to stay away from the abortion issue.
Its too controversial for many people and they don't want to deal with
it. John McCain has been pretty blunt what his intentions are, and for
once I don't think this politician is lying.
Editor of the Lilith eZine
The Art History Archive
The Automotive eZine
The Feminist eZine
Open Letter to Anti-Abortionists
The Politics eZine
OPEC Predicts $170 Oil
The Art History Archive, Feminist eZine and Lilith eZine are subsidiaries of the Lilith Gallery Network.
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list simply reply with the
word REMOVE in the subject line. Remember to use the same email address
you subscribed with.
Sun, Jun 29th - 9:43AM
Robert Mugabe declares victory in sham election
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe was on Sunday declared winner of
a widely condemned election which African observers said was scarred by
violence and intimidation. The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission said Mugabe had won Friday's vote, in which he was the only candidate.
84 year old Mugabe has been in power since independence from Britain in 1980, was due to be
sworn in shortly in a ceremony at State House, officials said.
Opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai, who withdrew from last Friday's
election a week ago, saying nearly 90 of his supporters had been killed
by government-backed militias, dismissed the inauguration as
meaningless. Tsvangirai had previously won an election back in March, but Mugabe's supporters refused to admit defeat and bullied their way into recounts and a second election. Blatant intimidation and murder of Tsvangirai's supporters has since caused Tsvangirai to go into hiding and flee for his life.
With the opposition powerless to stop widespread corruption and violence and Mugabe unwilling to even talk about releasing his ironfisted controll over Zimbabwe the only solution remaining is foreign intervention.Part of the problem is that Zimbabwe's HIV/AIDS epidemic is out of control and had reached 24.6% of the population by 2001. It could be as high as 30 or 40% by now. With an overall population of 12.3 million people that is a lot of people infected and a military intervention will have to be concerned with how to deal with so many AIDS patients.
In the meantime the economy in Zimbabwe has slipped badly. The unemployment rate was 80% in 2005 and the per capita GDP was $200. Back in 2003 the Zimbabwe dollar 82% of an American dollar but the exchange rate has since plummeted to 30,000 per one American dollar (which is to say Zimbabwean money is now worth less than toilet paper).
Their oil imports are relatively low so it would be comparably easy to set up a trade blockade with the country to prevent oil and gasoline products from going in (which would eventually cripple Zimbabwe's military power). Zimbabwe's military is already crippled by AIDS, poor funding and are basically pro-Mugabe street thugs drunk on power.
Its difficult to tell everything that is going on within Zimbabwe as very few reporters are allowed into the country and the reports coming out suggest that violence and rape is a regular occurrence. In a country that had such a large percentage of AIDS it does raise the question of whether the Zimbabwe army is accidentally or deliberately spreading AIDS amongst the populace.
Or is it the reverse? Could they be trying to exterminate AIDS through violence? Robert Mugabe's intentions are not clear.
It is becoming ridiculously obvious that a military intervention is needed and the only question is what countries will be willing to step up to the plate to prevent a complete catastrophe.
The United States is already mired down in two wars in the Iraq and Afghanistan, and the possibility of a third war with Iran is still possible. We won't be expecting any help from the USA, but other countries like Canada and members of the European Union could certainly help if someone would simply take the initiative.